Author asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf
Recipients Theo.Julienne, asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf, benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, r.david.murray, rhettinger
Date 2010-08-28.12:48:10
SpamBayes Score 0.000695364
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTinS8cM+KdP1bnGm0AgsokyM42hoToW9Lr_OZqrj@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <AANLkTikchv5P1EWbCDkap_bd9QCHHgRd9HspEjXOGf5s@mail.gmail.com>
Content
On 28 August 2010 22:41, david <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> david <db.pub.mail@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> On 28 August 2010 22:34, R. David Murray <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>>
>> R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment:
>>
>> This is not an appropriate discussion for the bug tracker.  Please take it to the Python mailing list.
>
> Fair enough.
> One last comment though (here) - I think that  making mutable objects
> being immutable outside their immediate scope  (by *default* ) would
> be a good solution.

%s/being//
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-28 12:48:11asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfsetrecipients: + asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf, loewis, rhettinger, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, r.david.murray, Theo.Julienne
2010-08-28 12:48:10asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdflinkissue9702 messages
2010-08-28 12:48:10asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfcreate