Author vlasovskikh
Recipients Albert.Strasheim, asksol, brian.curtin, jnoller, vlasovskikh
Date 2010-08-26.13:48:43
SpamBayes Score 2.50762e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1282830525.84.0.49871639031.issue8296@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> On closer look your patch is also ignoring SystemExit. I think it's beneficial to honor SystemExit, so a user could use this as a means to replace the current process with a new one.

Yes, SystemExit should cancel all the tasks that are currently in the queue. I guess my patch doesn't handle this properly.

> If we keep that behavior, the real problem here is that the result handler hangs if the process that reserved a job is gone, which is going to be handled by #9205. Should we mark it as a duplicate?

Yes, I think that #9205 covers this issue, so #8296 may be marked as a duplicate.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-26 13:48:46vlasovskikhsetrecipients: + vlasovskikh, jnoller, brian.curtin, asksol, Albert.Strasheim
2010-08-26 13:48:45vlasovskikhsetmessageid: <1282830525.84.0.49871639031.issue8296@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-26 13:48:44vlasovskikhlinkissue8296 messages
2010-08-26 13:48:43vlasovskikhcreate