Author jnoller
Recipients Albert.Strasheim, asksol, brian.curtin, jnoller, vlasovskikh
Date 2010-08-25.13:30:55
SpamBayes Score 0.0023949
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> If we keep that behavior, the real problem here is that the
> result handler hangs if the process that reserved a job is gone, which is going to be handled
> by #9205. Should we mark it as a duplicate?

I would tend to agree with your assessment; we're better served just
gracefully handling everything per 9205
Date User Action Args
2010-08-25 13:30:57jnollersetrecipients: + jnoller, brian.curtin, asksol, vlasovskikh, Albert.Strasheim
2010-08-25 13:30:55jnollerlinkissue8296 messages
2010-08-25 13:30:55jnollercreate