This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients baikie, flox, gdamjan, loewis, ncoghlan, orsenthil, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date 2010-08-25.13:08:39
SpamBayes Score 1.9975787e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1282741722.77.0.609000403383.issue9679@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
There was a discussion about IRI on python-dev in the middle of a discussion about adding a coercable bytes type, but I can't find it. I believe the conclusion was that the best solution for IRI support was a new library that implements the full IRI spec.  It is possible that we could just add IDNA support to urllib, but it isn't clear that that work would be worth it when what is really needed is full IRI support.

See also issue1500504, though my guess based on the python-dev discussion and my experience with email is that an IRI library will need to be carefully designed with the py3k bytes/string separation in mind.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-25 13:08:42r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, loewis, ncoghlan, orsenthil, vstinner, baikie, gdamjan, flox
2010-08-25 13:08:42r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1282741722.77.0.609000403383.issue9679@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-25 13:08:40r.david.murraylinkissue9679 messages
2010-08-25 13:08:39r.david.murraycreate