Author ncoghlan
Recipients BreamoreBoy, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, jvr, misc_from_metz, ncoghlan, nnorwitz, theller
Date 2010-08-22.08:42:17
SpamBayes Score 1.25904e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1282466540.01.0.498004661299.issue1284670@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The generalist in me is inclined to suggest a "depth" parameter (with depth=1 equivalent to direct dependencies only, and depth = None meaning all dependencies), but I must admit I don't have a concrete use case for the extra generality. So the simpler, recurse/don't recurse approach is probably a better option (building a depth-limited search on top of the recursion flag wouldn't be difficult anyway).

Aside from missing docs and unit test updates, the idea seems sound.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-22 08:42:20ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, nnorwitz, brett.cannon, theller, jvr, misc_from_metz, eric.araujo, BreamoreBoy
2010-08-22 08:42:20ncoghlansetmessageid: <1282466540.01.0.498004661299.issue1284670@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-22 08:42:18ncoghlanlinkissue1284670 messages
2010-08-22 08:42:17ncoghlancreate