➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients ezio.melotti, flox, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2010-08-19.17:42:37
SpamBayes Score 0.16906022
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1282239759.61.0.0316059563736.issue9636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Actually, no, the "consistency" of hashes is necessary for the
> BytesWarning to be useful with dicts.

Yes.  That's precisely the point I was trying to make.  (Probably badly.)
That's why I was calling the usefulness of BytesWarning with dicts 'fragile'.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-19 17:42:39mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, ezio.melotti, flox
2010-08-19 17:42:39mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1282239759.61.0.0316059563736.issue9636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-19 17:42:38mark.dickinsonlinkissue9636 messages
2010-08-19 17:42:37mark.dickinsoncreate