This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author michael.foord
Recipients denversc, kristjan.jonsson, michael.foord
Date 2010-08-15.22:16:36
SpamBayes Score 8.505481e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1281910598.87.0.205901276575.issue9587@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Providing access to the exception on the context manager was *precisely* to meet the use case of wanting to make assertions about the exception. I tend to agree with Guido that having one of the asserts return something is a bit odd, but irrespective of that I don't think we should have two ways of doing exactly the same thing. 

In general I find that the with statement version of assertRaises looks a lot better than the old way of calling it, so I guess I also disagree that it is "overkill" or adds bloat.

Sorry guys.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-15 22:16:39michael.foordsetrecipients: + michael.foord, kristjan.jonsson, denversc
2010-08-15 22:16:38michael.foordsetmessageid: <1281910598.87.0.205901276575.issue9587@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-15 22:16:37michael.foordlinkissue9587 messages
2010-08-15 22:16:36michael.foordcreate