Message113613
Am rejecting this feature request because of the concerns mentioned in the post on 4/3. The current requirement for explicit forwarding may be slightly inconvenient to type but it does add provide clarity that the method should be applied to the next-in-mro instead of the super object itself.
I appreciate the idea but think it would complicate an object that is already very difficult to understand and use correctly. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-08-11 19:08:50 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, georg.brandl, collinwinter, terry.reedy, BreamoreBoy |
2010-08-11 19:08:50 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1281553730.69.0.621223703767.issue1498363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-08-11 19:08:48 | rhettinger | link | issue1498363 messages |
2010-08-11 19:08:48 | rhettinger | create | |
|