Message113491
I think if they are mentioned, they should be documented. Removing mention of them would be fine with me.
Looking at this again, I think the description of Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT is no longer accurate. It reads: "This is a bitmask of all the bits that pertain to the existence of certain fields in the type object and its extension structures. Currently, it includes the following bits: Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION, Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG."
But neither of those flags pertain to the existence of certain fields, do they?
Perhaps it should simply read: "This bitmask should be set by all types to define certain bits used internally by Python." |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-08-09 22:18:19 | stutzbach | set | recipients:
+ stutzbach, georg.brandl, pitrou, docs@python |
2010-08-09 22:18:19 | stutzbach | set | messageid: <1281392299.67.0.124644070718.issue8041@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-08-09 22:18:18 | stutzbach | link | issue8041 messages |
2010-08-09 22:18:17 | stutzbach | create | |
|