Message 113424 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	benjamin.peterson
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, docs@python, georg.brandl, llimllib, terry.reedy
Date	2010-08-09.16:22:20
SpamBayes Score	0.011929678
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<AANLkTinV8Hfw9GdBizc2TA5F5vNbabWWbGmyZ-j2L82F@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1281370785.25.0.930624058339.issue6678@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
2010/8/9 Terry J. Reedy <report@bugs.python.org>: > > Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> added the comment: > > Benjamin: Previously, .currentframe() == sys._getframe() == sys._getframe(0) but you redefined it as sys._getframe(1), which is a change in semantics. Is this intentional (ie, was it buggy before)? Yes, currentframe() doesn't take an argument. Whether it should or not is a feature request.

2010/8/9 Terry J. Reedy <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> added the comment:
>
> Benjamin: Previously, .currentframe() == sys._getframe() == sys._getframe(0) but you redefined it as sys._getframe(1), which is a change in semantics. Is this intentional (ie, was it buggy before)?

Yes, currentframe() doesn't take an argument. Whether it should or not
is a feature request.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-08-09 16:22:22	benjamin.peterson	set	recipients: + benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, llimllib, docs@python
2010-08-09 16:22:21	benjamin.peterson	link	issue6678 messages
2010-08-09 16:22:20	benjamin.peterson	create