This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author lukasz.langa
Recipients brian.curtin, ezio.melotti, fdrake, lukasz.langa
Date 2010-08-03.14:47:57
SpamBayes Score 2.3949976e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1280846879.47.0.17748830308.issue9452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
FTR, some people questioned the purpose of read_dict(). Let me summarize this very briefly here:

- the API is using dictionaries similar to those in defaults= but has one level of depth more (sections)
- initializing a parser with a dictionary produces syntax that is more natural in code
- having a single method implementing reading a dictionary with unit tests, support for proper duplicate handling, etc. frees users from writing their own
- we need that anyway for upcoming mapping protocol access discussed in #5412
- more detailed use cases in msg112429
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-03 14:47:59lukasz.langasetrecipients: + lukasz.langa, fdrake, ezio.melotti, brian.curtin
2010-08-03 14:47:59lukasz.langasetmessageid: <1280846879.47.0.17748830308.issue9452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-03 14:47:57lukasz.langalinkissue9452 messages
2010-08-03 14:47:57lukasz.langacreate