Author eric.smith
Recipients eric.smith, ezio.melotti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, ron_adam, ysj.ray
Date 2010-07-28.14:59:24
SpamBayes Score 0.00728047
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1280329166.85.0.638205088977.issue7330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I think under the "we're all consenting adults" doctrine that it should be allowed. If you really want that behavior, why force the char*/%s dance at each call site when it's easy enough to do it in one place? I don't think anyone supplying a width would really be surprised that it would truncate the result and possibly break round-tripping through repr.

Besides, it's allowed in pure python code:
>>> '%.5r' % object()
'<obje'
History
Date User Action Args
2010-07-28 14:59:26eric.smithsetrecipients: + eric.smith, lemburg, mark.dickinson, ron_adam, ezio.melotti, ysj.ray
2010-07-28 14:59:26eric.smithsetmessageid: <1280329166.85.0.638205088977.issue7330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-07-28 14:59:24eric.smithlinkissue7330 messages
2010-07-28 14:59:24eric.smithcreate