Author lemburg
Recipients Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, ezio.melotti, lemburg, loewis, vstinner
Date 2010-07-28.14:54:27
SpamBayes Score 0.00151313
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4C5044A1.9000907@egenix.com>
In-reply-to <1280328646.6.0.169230278841.issue8776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
STINNER Victor wrote:
> 
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner@haypocalc.com> added the comment:
> 
>> Using that approach would work on POSIX systems.
> 
> As os.environb, I think that sys.argv should not exist on Windows.
> 
>> Another problem I see is synchronizing the two
> 
> os.environ and os.environb are synchronized. It would be possible to do the same with sys.argv and sys.argvb. The implement would be simplier because it's just a list, not a dict.

+1 on adding sys.argvb for systems that use char* in main().
History
Date User Action Args
2010-07-28 14:54:29lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, ezio.melotti, Arfrever
2010-07-28 14:54:27lemburglinkissue8776 messages
2010-07-28 14:54:27lemburgcreate