This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, djc, eric.araujo
Date 2010-07-20.20:09:53
SpamBayes Score 0.0022126716
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1279656603.11.0.946369765072.issue9314@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> why the pending status?

To me this is a way to say "I will close this next time I look unless someone will change my mind."  "pending" has a nice property that it will change to "open" once someone adds a comment.  This is exactly what I wanted in this case.

> do you think this is a doc bug?

Interestingly, I could not find any discussion of += for lists in the docs.  This maybe because "+=" is not really search friendly.  In any case, a doc bug (if any) should be reported under a separate issue.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-07-20 20:10:03belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, amaury.forgeotdarc, djc, eric.araujo
2010-07-20 20:10:03belopolskysetmessageid: <1279656603.11.0.946369765072.issue9314@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-07-20 20:09:53belopolskylinkissue9314 messages
2010-07-20 20:09:53belopolskycreate