Message109965
2010/7/11 Terry J. Reedy <report@bugs.python.org>
>
> Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> added the comment:
>
> If the content of the patch is correct, it looks ready to apply, with only
> a touch of editing. Do we have a resident expert of sqlite3? Or Laszlo, do
> you have a reference for the statements made?
>
Sorry, the only reference I have is that mailing list thread (
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-March/1239374.html ).
There you can find an example with SQL statements, showing the problem.
Ryan Kelly wrote the following:
<quote>
I have a theory, based on a quick perusal of the sqlite3 bindings
source.
The bindings think that "SAVEPOINT sp1" is a "non-DML, non-query"
statement. So when isolation_level is something other than None, this
statement implicitly commits the current transaction and throws away
your savepoints!
</quote>
So the problem is with the sqlite binding code, not sqlite itself. I'm not
an expert in C, so I'm not sure I can help more.
Thanks,
Laszlo |
File name |
Uploaded |
unnamed
|
nagylzs,
2010-07-11.05:29:51
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-07-11 05:29:54 | nagylzs | set | recipients:
+ nagylzs, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ghaering, docs@python |
2010-07-11 05:29:53 | nagylzs | link | issue8145 messages |
2010-07-11 05:29:53 | nagylzs | create | |
|