Author pitrou
Recipients benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, paddy3118, pitrou, terry.reedy
Date 2010-07-09.09:25:50
SpamBayes Score 0.00144465
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1278667547.3178.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> I actually would challenge the first sentence "A pythonic programming
> style which determines an object’s type by inspection of its method or
> attribute signature ". To me, and at least some usage on python-list,
> duck-typing means determining the interface (not type) by calling
> methods and catching exceptions if not present. This is the EAFP
> rather than inspection/LBYL style of duck typing.

Indeed. I would also remove "pythonic", because it will only confuse the
Date User Action Args
2010-07-09 09:25:58pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paddy3118, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo
2010-07-09 09:25:51pitroulinkissue3214 messages
2010-07-09 09:25:50pitroucreate