Author pitrou
Recipients LambertDW, eli.bendersky, georg.brandl, ggenellina, gjb1002, hagna, janpf, jimjjewett, mrotondo, pitrou, r.david.murray, rtvd, sjmachin, terry.reedy, tim.peters, vbr
Date 2010-07-08.22:52:45
SpamBayes Score 0.0108767
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1278629562.3235.42.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> There is no problem with extending the API in 3.2. The debate there is
> over 2.7.

We could extend the API as long as it stays backwards-compatible (that
is, the default value for the new argument produces the same behaviour
as before).
Date User Action Args
2010-07-08 22:52:47pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, jimjjewett, sjmachin, gjb1002, ggenellina, rtvd, vbr, LambertDW, hagna, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, janpf, mrotondo
2010-07-08 22:52:45pitroulinkissue2986 messages
2010-07-08 22:52:45pitroucreate