➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients LambertDW, eli.bendersky, georg.brandl, ggenellina, gjb1002, hagna, janpf, jimjjewett, mrotondo, pitrou, r.david.murray, rtvd, sjmachin, terry.reedy, tim.peters, vbr
Date 2010-07-08.22:52:45
SpamBayes Score 0.010876734
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1278629562.3235.42.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1278629277.05.0.932654283162.issue2986@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
> There is no problem with extending the API in 3.2. The debate there is
> over 2.7.

We could extend the API as long as it stays backwards-compatible (that
is, the default value for the new argument produces the same behaviour
as before).
History
Date User Action Args
2010-07-08 22:52:47pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, jimjjewett, sjmachin, gjb1002, ggenellina, rtvd, vbr, LambertDW, hagna, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, janpf, mrotondo
2010-07-08 22:52:45pitroulinkissue2986 messages
2010-07-08 22:52:45pitroucreate