Author pitrou
Recipients kristjan.jonsson, pitrou, tim.peters
Date 2010-07-04.17:59:11
SpamBayes Score 0.00396686
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1278266349.3250.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> All this patch does, is to generalize the mechanism already provided
> for genobject.c (by PyGen_NeedsFinalizing()), to any object: Any
> object can signal to gc that: a) it is ok to collect a cycle with me
> in it, or b) no, it is unsafe to do so.  With this patch in place,
> PyGen_NeedsFinalizing() no longer needs to be a special case in
> gcmodule.c.

Adding an API function and an additional traversal pass to the GC just
for the sake of removing a special case doesn't seem reasonable to me.
That's why I'm asking what specific problem you are trying to solve.
(rather than simply trying to make things "nicer")
Date User Action Args
2010-07-04 17:59:13pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, kristjan.jonsson
2010-07-04 17:59:11pitroulinkissue9141 messages
2010-07-04 17:59:11pitroucreate