Le samedi 19 juin 2010 à 00:55 +0000, geremy condra a écrit :
> geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> >
> > Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
> >
> >> Great, I'm thinking more-or-less the API proposed in PEP 272- the
> >> exception I'm thinking of is that 'strings' should be substituted for
> >> 'bytes'- for AES and DES. It gets trickier when talking about public
> >> key crypto, though. Perhaps something along the lines of
> >> RSA.new(public_key=None, private_key=None,...), with the resulting
> >> object supporting encrypt/decrypt/sign/verify operations?
> >
> > I don't have any opinion right now. I think a concrete proposal should
> > be initiated and we can iterate from that.
> > (that's assuming other people agree on the principle, of course)
> 
> I assume that by "a concrete proposal" you're talking about code? Or
> API docs? Also, what more needs to be done to ensure that other people
> agree on the principle?

I was thinking about a PEP. Of course, you are free to reuse existing
PEP content for that :)