This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, vstinner
Date 2010-06-17.20:14:03
SpamBayes Score 0.0755791
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1276805647.0.0.493291783319.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I am attaching datetime-sandbox-pypy.diff, a plain diff between six-year-old sandbox and pypy versions.  (Plain diff is cleaner than unified diff.)

You can see that the differences are trivial.  I notice, however that original datetime implementation was returning subclass instances from operations on datetime subclass instances.  Brett, this is off-topic hear, but I would appreciate your take on msg107410.

BTW, in order to preserve history, it may be a good idea to develop this in a branch off datetime sandbox and merge it back when ready.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-06-17 20:14:07belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban
2010-06-17 20:14:06belopolskysetmessageid: <1276805647.0.0.493291783319.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-06-17 20:14:04belopolskylinkissue7989 messages
2010-06-17 20:14:04belopolskycreate