Author brett.cannon
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, vstinner
Date 2010-06-17.19:47:19
SpamBayes Score 0.0109148
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1276804040.74.0.703804496332.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I would simply email their developer mailing list (find it at http://pypy.org/contact.html) and say that you are willing to work on this. Maciej and I have discussed this before, so this won't be a total shock to them.

As for Raymond's comment, I think he understood what I meant. What he is worried about is that datetime as PyPy has implemented it is done in RPython which is a custom subset of Python, and not a "normal" Python implementation. But if they have simply been maintaining the pure Python version that Tim wrote way back in the day then I suspect it's not in RPython.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-06-17 19:47:20brett.cannonsetrecipients: + brett.cannon, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban
2010-06-17 19:47:20brett.cannonsetmessageid: <1276804040.74.0.703804496332.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-06-17 19:47:19brett.cannonlinkissue7989 messages
2010-06-17 19:47:19brett.cannoncreate