Message106609
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
> > Would you prefer to not define the function instead of writing a pseudo-
> > atomic function?
>
> Your current implementation is useless, since it doesn't achieve anything
> new. Besides, if the function isn't atomic, don't name it atomic_XXX.
Someone may reimplement it with unlink+rename which is worse :-)
But ok, you prefer to not define the function if no real atomic implementation
can be written. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-05-27 12:24:22 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tarek, Trundle |
2010-05-27 12:24:21 | vstinner | link | issue8828 messages |
2010-05-27 12:24:20 | vstinner | create | |
|