Author vstinner
Recipients Trundle, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, tarek, vstinner
Date 2010-05-27.12:24:20
SpamBayes Score 0.00142853
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <201005271424.13812.victor.stinner@haypocalc.com>
In-reply-to <1274962281.31.0.664660375515.issue8828@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
> > Would you prefer to not define the function instead of writing a pseudo-
> > atomic function?
> 
> Your current implementation is useless, since it doesn't achieve anything
> new. Besides, if the function isn't atomic, don't name it atomic_XXX.

Someone may reimplement it with unlink+rename which is worse :-)

But ok, you prefer to not define the function if no real atomic implementation 
can be written.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-05-27 12:24:22vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tarek, Trundle
2010-05-27 12:24:21vstinnerlinkissue8828 messages
2010-05-27 12:24:20vstinnercreate