Author doko
Recipients doko, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, itkach, koen, lars.gustaebel, loewis, nikratio, pitrou, proyvind, v+python
Date 2010-05-26.15:31:38
SpamBayes Score 0.062481
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1274887901.62.0.781489983855.issue5689@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Per, on 2010-03-17, I asked you via email:

"I was looking at

  http://bugs.python.org/issue5689
  http://bugs.python.org/issue6715

and Martin's comments about the licensing of the bindings; is there a special reason for the lgpl3 license of the bindings, given that both python and xz-utils are not gpl'ed?"

Does pyliblzma need to be licensed under the lgpl3?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-05-26 15:31:41dokosetrecipients: + doko, loewis, georg.brandl, lars.gustaebel, pitrou, koen, eric.araujo, v+python, proyvind, nikratio, itkach
2010-05-26 15:31:41dokosetmessageid: <1274887901.62.0.781489983855.issue5689@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-05-26 15:31:39dokolinkissue5689 messages
2010-05-26 15:31:38dokocreate