Message106327
> msg106323 - Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) Date: 2010-05-22 20:17
I quite like your proposed alternative here. Not sure when/if I'll get to implement this.
> msg106324 - Author: Jean-Paul Calderone (exarkun) Date: 2010-05-22 22:17
Sorry I don't like this as much. I believe following the RFC for TLS SNI should be implicit and not something the programmer need to put effort into achieving. I acknowledge this approach does go against some explicit behaviour programming quality metrics. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-05-23 07:07:54 | grooverdan | set | recipients:
+ grooverdan, jcea, exarkun, janssen, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, pdp |
2010-05-23 07:07:53 | grooverdan | set | messageid: <1274598473.66.0.121630816864.issue5639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-05-23 07:07:50 | grooverdan | link | issue5639 messages |
2010-05-23 07:07:49 | grooverdan | create | |
|