Author grooverdan
Recipients exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, grooverdan, janssen, jcea, pdp, pitrou
Date 2010-05-23.07:07:48
SpamBayes Score 0.0486352
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1274598473.66.0.121630816864.issue5639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> msg106323 - Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) Date: 2010-05-22 20:17

I quite like your proposed alternative here. Not sure when/if I'll get to implement this.

> msg106324  - Author: Jean-Paul Calderone (exarkun) Date: 2010-05-22 22:17
Sorry I don't like this as much. I believe following the RFC for TLS SNI should be implicit and not something the programmer need to put effort into achieving. I acknowledge this approach does go against some explicit behaviour programming quality metrics.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-05-23 07:07:54grooverdansetrecipients: + grooverdan, jcea, exarkun, janssen, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, pdp
2010-05-23 07:07:53grooverdansetmessageid: <1274598473.66.0.121630816864.issue5639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-05-23 07:07:50grooverdanlinkissue5639 messages
2010-05-23 07:07:49grooverdancreate