Author mark.dickinson
Recipients belopolsky, mark.dickinson, mcherm, rhettinger, stutzbach, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2010-05-21.08:42:42
SpamBayes Score 4.21376e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
Alexander, I still don't understand your objection.  What's the downside of allowing the multiplication or division of a timedelta by a float?

Perhaps it's true that there are applications where timedeltas are best viewed as integers (with an implicitt 'microsecond' unit), but I think it's also true that there are plenty of applications where they're just regarded as a representation of a physical quantity, and there this proposal seems entirely appropriate.

I *would* want the timedelta * float and timedelta / float operations to be correctly rounded, so that behaviour is entirely predictable;  the current patch doesn't do that.  But it wouldn't be hard to implement:  there are functions available to express a float as a quotient of two integers, and after that the computation can be performed in integer arithmetic.
Date User Action Args
2010-05-21 08:42:46mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, mcherm, rhettinger, belopolsky, vstinner, stutzbach
2010-05-21 08:42:45mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <>
2010-05-21 08:42:44mark.dickinsonlinkissue1289118 messages
2010-05-21 08:42:42mark.dickinsoncreate