Message105284
I propose a different approach:
1. add a flag to PyModuleDef, indicating whether the module was built in UCS-2 or UCS-4 mode. Then let the interpreter refuse the load the module, instead of having the dynamic linker do so.
2. provide a mode for the header files where Py_UNICODE is not defined. add another flag to PyModuleDef indicating whether that mode was used when compiling the extension.
Module authors then can make a choice whether or not to refer to the Unicode internal representation in their module. If they do, a UCS-2 version won't load into a UCS-4 interpreter. If they don't refer to Py_UNICODE at all, the module can be used across the two modes.
There is a slight risk that a module may already crash before calling PyModule_Create. To prevent that, we need to specify that no Unicode API must be used before calling PyModule_Create. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-05-08 13:07:49 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, lemburg, gvanrossum, zooko, scoder, vstinner, stutzbach, r.david.murray |
2010-05-08 13:07:48 | loewis | set | messageid: <1273324068.67.0.0793338480532.issue8654@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-05-08 13:07:46 | loewis | link | issue8654 messages |
2010-05-08 13:07:45 | loewis | create | |
|