Author vstinner
Recipients LambertDW, akuchling, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, flox, ggenellina, gregory.p.smith, hozn, marystern, pitrou, tormen, vstinner
Date 2010-04-26.20:22:20
SpamBayes Score 9.73497e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1272313342.39.0.237096545424.issue5099@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm -1 on Brett's patch: keep a reference to the required functions in the function arguments is ugly to me. The process should be destroyed before unloading the modules. I don't know how (or even if it's possible or not :-)), but I think that Brett's patch is the wrong solution to the problem.

Eg. Can't we use atexit.register() to destroy the processes at exit?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-04-26 20:22:22vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, akuchling, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, ggenellina, pitrou, LambertDW, eric.araujo, marystern, brian.curtin, hozn, flox, tormen
2010-04-26 20:22:22vstinnersetmessageid: <1272313342.39.0.237096545424.issue5099@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-04-26 20:22:21vstinnerlinkissue5099 messages
2010-04-26 20:22:20vstinnercreate