Message 104221 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	lemburg
Recipients	doko, lemburg
Date	2010-04-26.11:22:42
SpamBayes Score	3.2709022e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<4BD57781.40408@egenix.com>
In-reply-to	<1272279643.52.0.447435684789.issue8535@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Matthias Klose wrote: > > New submission from Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>: > > Building with -flto (GCC 4.5.0) requires passing the very same optimization flags to the linker (lto1) as well. The attached patch just does this. Tested on Linux only, I don't know what will/could break on on other systems/compilers. On some systems, this may very well break, due to configruations where LDFLAGS and CFLAGS contain the same options. While this is normally not much of a problem, some compilers may complain about this. E.g. GCC on Mac OS X complains about duplicate use of the -sysroot option. It's probably better to just pass OPT to the linker instead.

Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
> New submission from Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>:
> 
> Building with -flto (GCC 4.5.0) requires passing the very same optimization flags to the linker (lto1) as well. The attached patch just does this.  Tested on Linux only, I don't know what will/could break on on other systems/compilers.

On some systems, this may very well break, due to
configruations where LDFLAGS and CFLAGS contain
the same options.

While this is normally not much of a problem, some compilers may complain
about this.

E.g. GCC on Mac OS X complains about duplicate use of the -sysroot
option.

It's probably better to just pass OPT to the linker instead.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-04-26 11:22:44	lemburg	set	recipients: + lemburg, doko
2010-04-26 11:22:42	lemburg	link	issue8535 messages
2010-04-26 11:22:42	lemburg	create