Author pitrou
Recipients janssen, loewis, pitrou, ssoria
Date 2010-04-26.00:43:25
SpamBayes Score 4.97989e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1272242608.4.0.118360094168.issue7672@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't think asking Python extensions to be safe in the face of brutal DLL unloading is wise. I don't think any of our C extensions tries to respect such an use case. We could still try to support the use case of some application registering its own callbacks before importing _ssl.

As for the patch, it looks wrong since CRYPTO_get_locking_callback() is compared to NULL a second time after the callback has been set to something non-NULL.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-04-26 00:43:28pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, janssen, ssoria
2010-04-26 00:43:28pitrousetmessageid: <1272242608.4.0.118360094168.issue7672@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-04-26 00:43:26pitroulinkissue7672 messages
2010-04-26 00:43:25pitroucreate