Message 103950 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	orsenthil
Recipients	MLModel, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, orsenthil
Date	2010-04-22.11:15:01
SpamBayes Score	2.5879071e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<20100422111451.GH14671@remy>
In-reply-to	<4BD02E0B.7010202@netwok.org>

Content
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:08:01AM +0000, Éric Araujo wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. Would it make sense to have either different > functions or a switch to existing ones to tell if we want legacy or > modern parsing? Hard at the moment, or is it a bleeding requirement? I doubt. But what is worth is full compliance on all scales with STD 66.

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:08:01AM +0000, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. Would it make sense to have either different
> functions or a switch to existing ones to tell if we want legacy or
> modern parsing?

Hard at the moment, or is it a bleeding requirement? I doubt. 
But what is worth is full compliance on all scales with STD 66.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-04-22 11:15:04	orsenthil	set	recipients: + orsenthil, georg.brandl, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, MLModel
2010-04-22 11:15:02	orsenthil	link	issue5650 messages
2010-04-22 11:15:01	orsenthil	create