Message103833
Or perhaps the bytearray can be converted to a bytes object. This is not optimal performance-wise but is unlikely to make a difference in real-world code (if you are passing a filename to an external API, chances are some IO will occur which will dwarf the cost of creating a separate bytes object).
But I agree that supporting bytearrays in filename-taking functions, while "nice" from a consistency point of view, isn't really useful in practice. So I would be ok to remove that support if it simplifies (or avoids complexifying) the logic for those functions. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-21 12:28:57 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, vstinner |
2010-04-21 12:28:57 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1271852937.17.0.825806652857.issue8485@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-21 12:28:55 | pitrou | link | issue8485 messages |
2010-04-21 12:28:55 | pitrou | create | |
|