Message103732
BTW, it does not bother me that "date.strptime()
seems a bit odd, given that it cannot accept a time part." To me "time" in strptime means time specification that may include date, time or even just month. If parsed specification does not fit in date (includes time component), date.strptime fails. There is nothing wrong with it. An alternative would be to make {date,time}.strptime() promiscuous and just drop unneeded components, but that would make these functions less useful because such behavior is simply datetime.strptime(..).{date,time}(). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-20 16:12:38 | Alexander.Belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ Alexander.Belopolsky, guettli, amaury.forgeotdarc, sonderblade, alanvgreen, ajaksu2, josh-sf, tiktuk |
2010-04-20 16:12:38 | Alexander.Belopolsky | set | messageid: <1271779958.55.0.0592610644508.issue1100942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-20 16:12:34 | Alexander.Belopolsky | link | issue1100942 messages |
2010-04-20 16:12:34 | Alexander.Belopolsky | create | |
|