Message103354
After thinking a bit about it, we're in quasi-feature freeze now for 2.x and it doesn't sound reasonable to add options to unwrap(); we would need to write tests to exercise these options and their behaviour. Also, they aren't strictly needed to fix the issues at hand, but provide a functional benefit.
So I've taken some of Darryl's ideas and fixes and incorporated them. Here is a new patch with them. I've checked compatibility with OpenSSL 1.0.0 and 0.9.8k. If nobody manifests him/herself I will commit it soon.
(note: I dropped the idea of checking for application data with SSL_peek(), since it seems to be a blocking call; at least one of the test_ssl test cases froze here) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-16 19:32:07 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, jcea, janssen, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, Arfrever, flox, dlmiles |
2010-04-16 19:32:06 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1271446326.5.0.875614654684.issue8108@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-16 19:32:05 | pitrou | link | issue8108 messages |
2010-04-16 19:32:04 | pitrou | create | |
|