Author pitrou
Recipients exarkun, loewis, marcin.bachry, pitrou, spiv
Date 2010-04-15.13:52:50
SpamBayes Score 0.000580516
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1271339572.03.0.533462398416.issue8407@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm with Martin, better to target 3.2 IMO.
Does signalfd really bring something compared to set_wakeup_fd()?
The one big difference I can see is that set_wakeup_fd() doesn't transmit the signal number, but this could be fixed if desired (instead of sending '\0', send a byte containing the signal number).
History
Date User Action Args
2010-04-15 13:52:52pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, spiv, exarkun, marcin.bachry
2010-04-15 13:52:52pitrousetmessageid: <1271339572.03.0.533462398416.issue8407@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-04-15 13:52:50pitroulinkissue8407 messages
2010-04-15 13:52:50pitroucreate