Author neologix
Recipients DazWorrall, aconrad, alex, brian.curtin, carljm, coderanger, cool-RR, dabeaz, djc, durin42, eric.araujo, eric.smith, flox, jcea, jhylton, karld, kevinwatters, konryd, larry, loewis, mahmoudimus, movement, neologix, nirai, pitrou, rcohen, rh0dium, salgado, tarek, thouis
Date 2010-04-14.22:00:03
SpamBayes Score 6.28941e-14
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
Some more remarks:
- COND_TIMED_WAIT macro modifies timeout_result when pthread_cond_timewait expires. But timeout_result is not an int pointer, just an int. So it is never updated, and as a result, bfs_check_depleted is never set after a thread has waited for the current running thread to schedule it in vain (in _bfs_timed_wait).
- the scheduling function bfs_find_task returns the first task that has an expired deadline. since an expired deadline probably means that the scheduler hasn't run for a while, it might be worth it to look for the thread with the oldest deadline and serve it first, instead of stopping at the first one
- calls to COND_WAIT/COND_TIMED_WAIT should be run in loops checking for the predicate, since it might be false even after these call return (spurious wakeups, etc):
"In general, whenever a condition wait returns, the thread has to re-evaluate the predicate associated with the condition wait to determine whether it can safely proceed, should wait again, or should declare a timeout. A return from the wait does not imply that the associated predicate is either true or false. 

It is thus recommended that a condition wait be enclosed in the equivalent of a "while loop" that checks the predicate."
Date User Action Args
2010-04-14 22:00:08neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, loewis, jhylton, jcea, pitrou, movement, larry, eric.smith, kevinwatters, tarek, djc, karld, carljm, coderanger, durin42, eric.araujo, nirai, alex, konryd, brian.curtin, flox, DazWorrall, salgado, cool-RR, rh0dium, rcohen, dabeaz, mahmoudimus, aconrad, thouis
2010-04-14 22:00:07neologixsetmessageid: <>
2010-04-14 22:00:05neologixlinkissue7946 messages
2010-04-14 22:00:03neologixcreate