Author pitrou
Recipients beazley, dabeaz, flox, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, pitrou, torsten
Date 2010-04-07.00:11:55
SpamBayes Score 5.06213e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1270599234.3518.65.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <1270597990.96.0.191599968356.issue8299@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> The counter is "stall cycles".
> During the 10 second run on my 2.4Ghz cpu, we had instruction cache
> miss stalls for 2 billion cycles (2000 samples of 1000000 cycles per
> sample).  That does account for around 10% of the availible cpu.

Ok, thanks.

> 2) The poor performance of competing CPU threads on multicore machines
> is due to the instruction cache behaviour of non-overlapping thread
> execution on different cores.

Have you tried your measurement approach with ccbench?

> We can fix 1) easily, even with a much less invasive patch than the
> ones I have put in here.  I'm a bit surprised at the apparent
> disinterest in such an obvious bug / fix.

As already said, it's too late for 2.7. And the fix in 3.2 is most
probably better.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-04-07 00:11:58pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, beazley, kristjan.jonsson, flox, dabeaz, torsten
2010-04-07 00:11:56pitroulinkissue8299 messages
2010-04-07 00:11:55pitroucreate