Message102027
I think namespacing utility functions / classes inside unittest is fine (even good), but agree that there needs to be careful thinking about APIs that are made public in this way. To a certain extent this code has already proved its utility, but up until now it hasn't needed to be *generally* useful (and as brett says - some of the code in test_support would be better off dead). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-03-31 18:53:37 | michael.foord | set | recipients:
+ michael.foord, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, tim.golden, tarek, r.david.murray, flox |
2010-03-31 18:53:36 | michael.foord | set | messageid: <1270061616.94.0.901928649473.issue8273@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-03-31 18:53:35 | michael.foord | link | issue8273 messages |
2010-03-31 18:53:35 | michael.foord | create | |
|