Message101997
Actually, the list Terek posted a link to is a public doc page, and as was made clear in the recent issue about the check_warnings helper, we do have to maintain backward compatibility.
There (should be) undocumented stuff in test_support, purposely left undocumented so that we *don't* have to maintain backward compatibility. Myself I wish that doc page didn't even exist. Putting stuff that users can use into unittest is a much better idea.
Maybe we could move the appropriate stuff and get rid of the test_support doc page altogether. And when we move stuff to unittest maybe we could take the opportunity to clean up any warts in the interfaces. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-03-31 11:54:47 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, georg.brandl, tarek, michael.foord |
2010-03-31 11:54:47 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1270036487.32.0.439491913783.issue8273@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-03-31 11:54:45 | r.david.murray | link | issue8273 messages |
2010-03-31 11:54:45 | r.david.murray | create | |
|