Author nirai
Recipients DazWorrall, alex, brian.curtin, carljm, coderanger, dabeaz, eric.smith, flox, jcea, jhylton, karld, kevinwatters, loewis, mahmoudimus, nirai, pitrou, rcohen, rh0dium, tarek
Date 2010-03-25.17:58:04
SpamBayes Score 9.41075e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1269539886.34.0.951160418724.issue7946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Well, on initial check the scheduler seems to work well with regular gettimeofday() wall clock instead of clock_gettime().

:)

/* Return thread running time in seconds (with nsec precision). */
static inline long double get_thread_timestamp(void) {
    return get_timestamp(); // wall clock via gettimeofday()
    /*struct timespec ts;
    clock_gettime(CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID, &ts);
    return (long double) ts.tv_sec + ts.tv_nsec * 0.000000001;*/
}

Does it make things better on your system?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-03-25 17:58:06niraisetrecipients: + nirai, loewis, jhylton, jcea, pitrou, eric.smith, kevinwatters, tarek, karld, carljm, coderanger, alex, brian.curtin, flox, DazWorrall, rh0dium, rcohen, dabeaz, mahmoudimus
2010-03-25 17:58:06niraisetmessageid: <1269539886.34.0.951160418724.issue7946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-03-25 17:58:04nirailinkissue7946 messages
2010-03-25 17:58:04niraicreate