Message101683
>> Once it's moved into syslog, maybe syslog_exception named syslog.log_exception.
That's "should be named", of course. Although on second thought maybe syslog.syslog_exception really is the right name, to mirror syslog.syslog.
> In that case, how would be called the second function? Can write a patch with an unit test?
I'm not sure which second function you mean.
As far as the implementation, Sean's working on it, although I'm willing to help. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-03-25 09:30:27 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, jafo, vstinner |
2010-03-25 09:30:27 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1269509427.37.0.625361481323.issue8214@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-03-25 09:30:25 | eric.smith | link | issue8214 messages |
2010-03-25 09:30:25 | eric.smith | create | |
|