Message101515
Roumen Petrov (rpetrov) wrote:
>>
>> Jesús Cea Avión<jcea@jcea.es> added the comment:
>>
>> I just did the minimal change. I don't know if removing "defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV)" is safe.
> The python build system is full with minimal changes and result is a
> big mess. Did you found which revision add ".. defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV)"
> in posix*.c ?
The code was added in 2002-07-30 by nnorwitz, to support OSF1 (Dec Unix). Is that platform still supported?. I don't see any related buildbot.
>> "HAVE_DEVICE_MACROS" is defined if "configure" finds "makedev()" macro.
> And what is result on you platform ?
It is defined if I add the new "include".
> Cases:
> 1) platform is no longer supported - it is save to remove test case from
> configure and defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV) from posixmodule.c
Do we have a list of officially supported?.
> 2) HAVE_DEVICE_MACROS is defined for you . Then check how is written
> test for HAVE_DEVICE_MACROS and make test for makedev similar.
Investigating the issue, I could say that HAVE_MAKEDEV should be deleted, but I don't have access to a OSF1 machine for trying.
How should I proceed? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-03-22 15:32:45 | jcea | set | recipients:
+ jcea, loewis, pitrou, movement, sandberg |
2010-03-22 15:32:44 | jcea | set | messageid: <1269271964.95.0.306702019307.issue3928@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-03-22 15:32:42 | jcea | link | issue3928 messages |
2010-03-22 15:32:41 | jcea | create | |
|