Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFE: Extend smtplib.py with support for LMTP #40270

Closed
zwoop mannequin opened this issue May 19, 2004 · 5 comments
Closed

RFE: Extend smtplib.py with support for LMTP #40270

zwoop mannequin opened this issue May 19, 2004 · 5 comments

Comments

@zwoop
Copy link
Mannequin

zwoop mannequin commented May 19, 2004

BPO 957003
Nosy @loewis, @birkenfeld, @terryjreedy
Files
  • smtplib.py.diff: smtplib.py diff for LMTP
    		•

    Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2007-03-09.15:36:21.000>
created_at = <Date 2004-05-19.19:56:08.000>
labels = []
title = 'RFE: Extend smtplib.py with support for LMTP'
updated_at = <Date 2007-03-09.15:36:21.000>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/zwoop'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2007-03-09.15:36:21.000>
actor = 'loewis'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['None']
creation = <Date 2004-05-19.19:56:08.000>
creator = 'zwoop'
dependencies = []
files = ['5975']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 957003
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 5.0
messages = ['46001', '46002', '46003', '46004', '46005']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['loewis', 'georg.brandl', 'terry.reedy', 'zwoop']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'accepted'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue957003'
versions = ['Python 2.5']
    @zwoop
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    zwoop mannequin commented May 19, 2004

    Hi,

    attached is a proposal to extend the existing
    smtplib.py module with support for LMTP (RFC2033). I
    find it very useful together with IMAP servers like Cyrus.

    Thanks,

    -- leif

    @zwoop zwoop mannequin closed this as completed May 19, 2004
    @zwoop zwoop mannequin closed this as completed May 19, 2004
    @terryjreedy
    Copy link
    Member

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=593130

    If you were mere requesting a feature enhancement, this
    would belong in the RFE list and not the bug list. Since you
    submitted a patch, and not just a proposal, this belongs in
    the patch list. However, as a patch submission, it also needs

    1. a patch to the documentation for smtplib (at least the
      suggested new text if you can't do Latex) and 2) a patch to
      the test suite for smtplib (assuming there is one already).

    Suggestion: close this bug report as invalid and open a patch
    item with the additional material.

    @zwoop
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    zwoop mannequin commented Jun 1, 2004

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=480913

    Is the documentation provided in the patch for the LMTP
    class not sufficient? I can extend on that if necessary,
    although bear in mind that LMTP is very, very similar to
    SMTP. The main difference is the support for Unix sockets.

    As for adding test code, I could do that, although I'm
    guessing most people will not have an LMTP capable server
    running. If you feel strongly on this, I'll add something
    that will check for port 2003, and submit the same test
    message through an LMTP instance.

    @birkenfeld
    Copy link
    Member

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1188172

    Moving to the patches tracker. As a new feature, assigning
    to group Python 2.5.

    @loewis
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    loewis mannequin commented Mar 9, 2007

    Thanks for the patch. Committed as r54240

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 9, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    No branches or pull requests
    2 participants
    @birkenfeld @terryjreedy