Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix #416670: register SRE types #34417

Closed
loewis mannequin opened this issue Apr 26, 2001 · 2 comments
Closed

Fix #416670: register SRE types #34417

loewis mannequin opened this issue Apr 26, 2001 · 2 comments

Comments

@loewis
Copy link
Mannequin

loewis mannequin commented Apr 26, 2001

BPO 419070
Nosy @loewis
Files
  • copy.patch
  • test_copy.py
    		•

    Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2001-10-18.18:40:35.000>
created_at = <Date 2001-04-26.07:59:22.000>
labels = []
title = 'Fix python/cpython#34351: register SRE types'
updated_at = <Date 2001-10-18.18:40:35.000>
user = 'https://github.com/loewis'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2001-10-18.18:40:35.000>
actor = 'effbot'
assignee = 'effbot'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['None']
creation = <Date 2001-04-26.07:59:22.000>
creator = 'loewis'
dependencies = []
files = ['3290', '3291']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 419070
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['36458', '36459']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['loewis', 'effbot']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'low'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue419070'
versions = []
    @loewis
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    loewis mannequin commented Apr 26, 2001

    This patch registers the three SRE types in the copy
    module as immutable, atomic types. This is not
    completely correct, since pattern.groupindex is a
    mutable object (a dictionary). Since nobody *should*
    change that dictionary, treating it as immutable is
    sufficient.

    @loewis loewis mannequin closed this as completed Apr 26, 2001
    @loewis loewis mannequin assigned effbot Apr 26, 2001
    @effbot
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    effbot mannequin commented Oct 18, 2001

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=38376

    SRE has (almost) grown __copy__ and __deepcopy__
    hooks instead. Just need to write some test code
    before enabling it.

    </F>

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 9, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    No branches or pull requests
    0 participants