Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

asyncio.wait documentation on non-emptiness requirement lost in bpo-33649 #84679

Closed
JoelRosdahl mannequin opened this issue May 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

asyncio.wait documentation on non-emptiness requirement lost in bpo-33649 #84679

JoelRosdahl mannequin opened this issue May 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
3.7 (EOL) end of life 3.8 only security fixes 3.9 only security fixes docs Documentation in the Doc dir

Comments

@JoelRosdahl
Copy link
Mannequin

JoelRosdahl mannequin commented May 4, 2020

BPO 40499
Nosy @gvanrossum, @jrosdahl
PRs
  • bpo-40499: Mention that asyncio.wait() needs a non-empty aws set #19900
    		•

    Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2020-05-04.21:56:50.975>
created_at = <Date 2020-05-04.12:16:17.532>
labels = ['3.7', '3.8', '3.9', 'docs']
title = 'asyncio.wait documentation on non-emptiness requirement lost in bpo-33649'
updated_at = <Date 2020-05-04.21:56:50.975>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/JoelRosdahl'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2020-05-04.21:56:50.975>
actor = 'gvanrossum'
assignee = 'docs@python'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2020-05-04.21:56:50.975>
closer = 'gvanrossum'
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2020-05-04.12:16:17.532>
creator = 'Joel Rosdahl'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 40499
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['368041', '368091']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'jrosdahl', 'docs@python', 'Joel Rosdahl']
pr_nums = ['19900']
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue40499'
versions = ['Python 3.7', 'Python 3.8', 'Python 3.9']
    @JoelRosdahl
    Copy link
    Mannequin Author

    JoelRosdahl mannequin commented May 4, 2020

    bpo-21596 documented that the sequence of futures passed to asyncio.wait must not be empty:

    The sequence *futures* must not be empty.

    This note was however lost in the bpo-33649 commit
    (3faaa88).

    @JoelRosdahl JoelRosdahl mannequin added 3.7 (EOL) end of life 3.8 only security fixes 3.9 only security fixes labels May 4, 2020
    @JoelRosdahl JoelRosdahl mannequin assigned docspython May 4, 2020
    @JoelRosdahl JoelRosdahl mannequin added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label May 4, 2020
    @gvanrossum
    Copy link
    Member

    New changeset 9d74658 by Joel Rosdahl in branch 'master':
    bpo-40499: Mention that asyncio.wait() needs a non-empty aws set (GH-19900)
    9d74658

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    3.7 (EOL) end of life 3.8 only security fixes 3.9 only security fixes docs Documentation in the Doc dir
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    No branches or pull requests
    1 participant
    @gvanrossum