The suggestion given when a for and print with the syntax for python 2.x are used together seems erroneous.

Steps to reproduce:
Just type following in the python interpreter (3.x):

for p in some_list: print p

The error produced is:

SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(in some_list: print p)?

I am also attaching a small file, that produces the error when run with:

python3 printBug.py

Thank you for the report. The change to the exception message was added in bpo-30597, but it looks like it may be too greedy. Adding the developer to the nosy list.

Thanks for the report Mayank!

As we discussed offline, it is indeed reproducible if someone uses print on the same line (such as in this case, where a loop is used).

I will look into this issue.

Re-reading the code for _set_legacy_print_statement_msg, I noticed that we're not currently taking the "start" parameter into account, and that's the offset the compiler passes in to tell us where on the line it found the text "print ". Oops :)

We're also currently going to mishandle code like "x = 1; print x; pass" as well: the suggestion for that is "print(x)", but we would currently suggest "print(print x; pass)".

Fixing the left offset shouldn't be too difficult, as I believe the correct value for that is just "PRINT_OFFSET + start".

For the right offset, I think we'll want to drop the initial XStrip call added for bpo-32028 entirely, and instead calculate the right offset as a PyUnicode_FindChar search for ";" (replacing it with the length of the input string if the separator isn't found).

Any trailing whitespace (either before the ";", if one is present, or before the end of the line otherwise) will then be stripped by the remaining XStrip call (the one after the PyUnicode_Substring call).

(Even with those improvements, there will still be cases where the heuristic gives an incorrect suggestion due to a syntax error within the expression to be displayed, like "print value:", but there isn't anything simple we can do about those short of trying to compile the calculated suggestion, and I'm not prepared to go that far yet)

For the right offset, I think we'll want to drop the initial XStrip call added for bpo-32028 entirely, and instead calculate the right offset as a PyUnicode_FindChar search for ";" (replacing it with the length of the input string if the separator isn't found).

Are ';' and whitespace the only allowed characters following the print expression?

They're the only characters we won't want to include as part of the suggestion, since they indicate the end of the statement.

New changeset 43c0f1a by Nick Coghlan (Nitish Chandra) in branch 'master':
bpo-32685: Improve suggestion for print statement (GH-5375)
43c0f1a

New changeset b3b4b81 by Nick Coghlan (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.6':
bpo-32685: Improve suggestion for print statement (GH-5380)
b3b4b81

Thanks for the patches, Sanyam & Nitish, and for the original bug report Mayank.

Thanks also to Cheryl for nudging us to get it resolved :)