Currently, datetime.strptime does not support parsing utc offsets that include a colon. "+0000" is parsed without issues whilst it fails with "+00:00".

"+NN:NN" is not only ISO8601 valid but also the way the offset is presented to the user when using .isoformat on a datetime with a timezone/offset.

This lead to the users needing to go to external libraries like dateutil or iso8601 just to be able to parse the datetime encoded in strings that "datetime" produces.

Even if a long-term goal would be to provide a way to parse any isoformatted string this issue just aims to address the problem that the %z parsing presents. This already unblocks users from parsing datetime object serialized with isoformat.

With this change, the following will just work:

>> import datetime as dt
>> iso_fmt = '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%z'
>> d = dt.datetime.strptime('2004-01-01T10:10:10+05:00', iso_fmt)

*'2004-01-01T10:10:10+05:00' is a sample string generated via datetime.isoformat()

Other options like having a new %:z was proposed but having just %z seems much simpler for the user.

Note: There has been already conversations about adding support on datetime to parse any ISO-formatted string. This is a more simplistic approach. We might be able to get to that situation after this patch, but this aims just to unblock us.

Related:
http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/iso-tc154-wg5_n0039_iso_wd_8601-2_2016-02-16.pdf
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027018.html
https://bugs.python.org/issue15873

FWIW it looks like “strptime” in glibc, and Open and Free BSD support parsing this and even more formats (RFC 822 and RFC 3339; includes “Z”, U.S. time zones, ±HH). Also, there is bpo-24954 for adding “%:z” like Gnu “date”.

Sorry, I meant Net BSD not Free BSD

Yep, http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/strptime.3.html does support it even if it might look asymetrical.

Example:

           struct tm tm;
           char buf[255];

       memset(&tm, 0, sizeof(struct tm));
       strptime("+00:00", "%z", &tm);
       strftime(buf, sizeof(buf), "%z", &tm);
       puts(buf); // Will print +0000
       exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);

Martin do you want me to "cleanup" the PR, add docs, news entry, etc?

This seems very useful to me. I very frequently advise people *against* using dateutil.parser (despite my conflict of interest as maintainer of dateutil) for well-known formats, but the problem frequently comes up of, "what should I do when I have date created by isoformat()?", to which there's no clean satisfying answer other than, "use dateutil.parser even though you know the format."

I think the strptime page that Mario linked to is evidence that the %z directive is *intended* to match against -HH:MM, and so that might be the most "standard" solution.

That said, I somewhat prefer the granularity of the GNU date extensions %z, %:z and %::z, since this allows downstream users to be stricter about what they are willing to accept. I think either approach is defensible, but that *something* should be done soon, preferably for the 3.7 release.

As a note

Seems support for the ":" was added in 2015 for glibc:
http://code.metager.de/source/xref/gnu/glibc/time/strptime_l.c#765

Commit e952e1df

Before that, it basically just ignores the minutes.

I have a patch to add 'Z' support as well if we are interested in making it the same as it glibc does. (as it supports it as well)

Note that bpo-5288 relaxed the whole number of minutes restriction on UTC offsets. Since the goal is to be able to parse the output of .isoformat(), I think %z should accept sub-minute offsets.

New changeset 3231893 by Alexander Belopolsky (Mario Corchero) in branch 'master':
Closes bpo-31800: Support for colon when parsing time offsets (bpo-4015)
3231893