New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IDLE: Enhance module browser #75642
Comments
This is an index issue for keeping track of improvements to IDLE's class browser. They should mostly (or all?) be done in separate issues and PRs. Existing issues with patches. Only the first, a 'must', is recently reviewed. New 'must' issues that need patches. Other potential issues, most of which also affect pathbrowser. Browsers currently use idlelib.tree.TreeWidget. Treeview is not a drop-in replacement because TreeWidget has some of the higher-level app-specific functions that users are expected to add to Treeview. But could Treeview replace the low-level parts of TreeWidget that actually display stuff on the screen? Us |
bpo-31552 ttk.Treeview |
bpo-25090 opened with a broad discussion of module broswer and code context, but I focused it on removing the folder and file icons misused for classes and functions in Module Browser. Above, I suggested possibly changing pathbrowser, but I have decided against that. The patch will be trivial, so I am going to do it and see what I think. |
Sorry about that. You can do 31460 if you want. I haven't started it. |
Whoops, patching tree.py to not use icons is not trivial. See new comment on bpo-25090. |
|
Thanks. 6 of 9 tasks are done. Will eventually replace with new task issue with undone items and ideas. It appears from experiments that |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: