Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[3.5] Backport regrtest features from master to Python 3.5 #74568

Closed
vstinner opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

[3.5] Backport regrtest features from master to Python 3.5 #74568

vstinner opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 8 comments
Labels
tests Tests in the Lib/test dir

Comments

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

BPO 30383
Nosy @vstinner
PRs
  • [3.5] bpo-30383: Backport regrtest and test_regrtest enhancements from master to 3.5 #2279
  • [3.5] bpo-30383: Add NEWS entry for backported regrtest #2438
    		•

    Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2017-06-27.12:04:34.229>
created_at = <Date 2017-05-17.00:21:53.756>
labels = ['tests']
title = '[3.5] Backport regrtest features from master to Python 3.5'
updated_at = <Date 2017-06-27.12:04:34.228>
user = 'https://github.com/vstinner'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2017-06-27.12:04:34.228>
actor = 'vstinner'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2017-06-27.12:04:34.229>
closer = 'vstinner'
components = ['Tests']
creation = <Date 2017-05-17.00:21:53.756>
creator = 'vstinner'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 30383
keywords = []
message_count = 8.0
messages = ['293827', '296349', '296354', '296355', '296356', '297025', '297026', '297027']
nosy_count = 1.0
nosy_names = ['vstinner']
pr_nums = ['2279', '2438']
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue30383'
versions = ['Python 3.5']
    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    bpo-30283 backported regrtest features from master to Python 2.7. I now propose to do the same for Python 3.5, as suggested by Serhiy Storshaka.

    @vstinner vstinner added the tests Tests in the Lib/test dir label May 17, 2017
    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    I chose to not backport test_huntrleaks_fd_leak() since I expect bugs, and I'm not interested at this point to fix such issues.

    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    New changeset a601fcc by Victor Stinner in branch '3.5':
    [3.5] bpo-30383: Backport regrtest and test_regrtest enhancements from master to 3.5 (bpo-2279)
    a601fcc

    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    I backport all test_regrtest except of test_huntrleaks_fd_leak() which is a deliberate choice, so I now close the issue.

    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Oh, while reading bpo-30283, I see that Serhiy asked me to mention regrtest enhancements. So I reopen the issue.

    @vstinner vstinner reopened this Jun 19, 2017
    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    PR 2438 adds the NEWS entry.

    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    New changeset eef254d by Victor Stinner in branch '3.5':
    bpo-30383: Add NEWS entry for backported regrtest (bpo-2438)
    eef254d

    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member Author

    I backported almost all regrtest features from master to 3.5. You should now get almost the same tool, even if the implementation is much older (regrtest was deeply reworked in master, a new test.libregrtest package was created).

    I added the NEWS entry.

    I now close the issue.

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    No branches or pull requests
    1 participant
    @vstinner