New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Small typos in IDLE doc #74394
Comments
Fix some small typos in IDLE doc. |
Thank you for the review. These are definitely bugs. Please check IDLE component also for IDLE doc issues. That will auto-assign them to me. Your first merged PR? If so, congrats. Changes should be applied to at least 3.6, if not 3.5 and 2.7. 3.6 doc should be essentially identical, so I expect merge without conflict. Likely true for others. Can you (easily) prepare the PRs? Can you use the cherry-pick script? |
I followed the steps for cherry-pick, but messed up a little as I made 3 PRs instead of one. However, I couldn't do the labels asked for in this section: When a cherry-pick was applied successfully, this script will open up a browser tab that points to the pull request creation page. The url of the pull request page looks similar to the following: 3.5...\<username>:backport-6de2b78-3.5?expand=1
|
From what I have seen, one PR for each branch is correct. I believe cherry-pick.py was initially written by Mariatta. Please bring up any problems or questions using it on core-mentorship, where she and others will see it. |
For this "Please check IDLE component also for IDLE doc issues.", I see the same text as the doc page in idlelib/help/html. Is that the one you want me to change or is that created automatically by Sphinx? |
I mean 'IDLE' in the Components: box, to the left of the Versions: box, both in the 'classification' frame near the top of this page. |
LOL, well I made that a lot harder than you intended. :-) |
One PR per branch is correct. For future reference, preferably the commit hash to be cherry-picked is the one that is merged into CPython's master branch. It can be found at the original PR where it says <coredeveloper> merged commit <hash> into python:master. For PR 1353, it is 9dc2b38. For this issue, it doesn't make much difference since the PR contains only one commit. For PRs that contain multiple commits, it makes more sense to cherry-pick the squashed commit to master :) Thanks :) |
Thank you for that information, Mariatta. I had to read your description Cherry-pick is an awesome tool. Can't wait to use it again! :-) On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Mariatta Wijaya <report@bugs.python.org>
|
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: