Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mention in the devguide that core dev stuff falls under the PSF CoC #70633

Closed
brettcannon opened this issue Feb 26, 2016 · 12 comments
Closed

Mention in the devguide that core dev stuff falls under the PSF CoC #70633

brettcannon opened this issue Feb 26, 2016 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir easy type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Comments

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

BPO 26446
Nosy @brettcannon, @vstinner, @ezio-melotti, @berkerpeksag, @willingc, @evelynmitchell
Files
  • patchCoreCoC
  • patchCoreDevCoC
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/brettcannon'
    closed_at = <Date 2016-07-14.04:54:31.739>
    created_at = <Date 2016-02-26.19:24:27.782>
    labels = ['easy', 'type-feature', 'docs']
    title = 'Mention in the devguide that core dev stuff falls under the PSF CoC'
    updated_at = <Date 2016-07-14.04:54:31.738>
    user = 'https://github.com/brettcannon'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2016-07-14.04:54:31.738>
    actor = 'berker.peksag'
    assignee = 'brett.cannon'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2016-07-14.04:54:31.739>
    closer = 'berker.peksag'
    components = ['Devguide']
    creation = <Date 2016-02-26.19:24:27.782>
    creator = 'brett.cannon'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['43294', '43297']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 26446
    keywords = ['easy']
    message_count = 12.0
    messages = ['260907', '260983', '261091', '261203', '264032', '267767', '267772', '267872', '270270', '270274', '270369', '270370']
    nosy_count = 7.0
    nosy_names = ['brett.cannon', 'vstinner', 'ezio.melotti', 'python-dev', 'berker.peksag', 'willingc', 'Evelyn Mitchell']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue26446'
    versions = []

    @brettcannon
    Copy link
    Member Author

    It should be mentioned in the devguide that receiving one's core developer privileges includes following the PSF CoC (https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/).

    @brettcannon brettcannon added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Feb 26, 2016
    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti added easy type-feature A feature request or enhancement labels Feb 26, 2016
    @brettcannon
    Copy link
    Member Author

    @brettcannon
    Copy link
    Member Author

    The discussion seems to have gone in the direction of putting all core-controlled stuff under the CoC. So the devguide will mention this is the policy.

    @brettcannon brettcannon changed the title Mention in the devguide that core devs are expected to follow the PSF CoC Mention in the devguide that core dev stuff falls under the PSF CoC Mar 1, 2016
    @brettcannon
    Copy link
    Member Author

    The PSF board passed a resolution in January 2014 that all web-related stuff falls under the CoC: https://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/2014-01-06/#management-of-the-psfs-web-properties. I'm still pushing to get the CoC mentioned in the devguide but I've given up on pushing to explicitly state it for python-dev, bugs.python.org, or anywhere else.

    @brettcannon brettcannon self-assigned this Apr 22, 2016
    @brettcannon
    Copy link
    Member Author

    The python-dev thread more-or-less petered out w/ the basic agreement that adding a short mention in the devguide would be tolerable. When I have a chance I will add a very short mention at the end of the opening page.

    @berkerpeksag
    Copy link
    Member

    Thanks for the patch Evelyn. The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of suggestions:

    1. It seems like https://docs.python.org/devguide/coredev.html#responsibilities is a better place to put this

    2. Core committers -> Core developers

    3. PSF CoC -> PSF Code of Conduct

    4. Could you also link "PSF Code of Conduct" to https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ ? I always need to look at the Sphinx docs but we need to make it look like

      Spam eggs <https://python.org>_

    @evelynmitchell
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    evelynmitchell mannequin commented Jun 8, 2016

    Thank you for your help Berker.

    @brettcannon
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Thanks for the patch, Evelyn! The latest one LGTM and I will commit it when I have time.

    I do still plan to add a subsection at the bottom of the index page mentioning the CoC so it's in a very visible location.

    @vstinner
    Copy link
    Member

    Brett: "Thanks for the patch, Evelyn! The latest one LGTM and I will commit it when I have time."

    Ok, so are you going to push it?

    @brettcannon
    Copy link
    Member Author

    I figured Berker was/had when he did the review, but I can take care of it when I get around to it (prioritizing 3.6 features ATM).

    @python-dev
    Copy link
    Mannequin

    python-dev mannequin commented Jul 14, 2016

    New changeset 6b4b73ebb054 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
    Issue bpo-26446: Mention PSF CoC in core developer responsibilities
    https://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/6b4b73ebb054

    @berkerpeksag
    Copy link
    Member

    Sorry, I finally found some time to clear my CPython TODO list. Thanks for the patch, Evelyn!

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    docs Documentation in the Doc dir easy type-feature A feature request or enhancement
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    4 participants